xbbb`b``I j 246) Plaintiffs requested a telephone conference with the Court to discuss whether Defendant Washington University should be allowed to not designate a representative to discuss three topics 0000008699 00000 n hYrF}WLa fp,+rD. 0 The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. For any depositions conducted pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6), . The purpose of Rule 57.03(b)(4) is to permit a party to depose an opposing corporation's representative under circumstances in which the statements made by the witness on the identified topics will be admissible against and binding on the corporate party. Dixon v. Darnold, 939 S.W.2d 66, 69 (Mo.App.1997) (citing State ex rel. 0000001311 00000 n Knowledge of any compensation from Jones Supply to Defendant Dughly (or any other Rolfes driver), including any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones Supply products. endstream endobj 46 0 obj <> endobj 47 0 obj <> endobj 48 0 obj <>/ColorSpace<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 49 0 obj <> endobj 50 0 obj <> endobj 51 0 obj <> endobj 52 0 obj <> endobj 53 0 obj <> endobj 54 0 obj [/ICCBased 63 0 R] endobj 55 0 obj <> endobj 56 0 obj <> endobj 57 0 obj <> endobj 58 0 obj <> endobj 59 0 obj <>stream Because the person designated as the corporate representative is exempt from the sequestration of witnesses, it is frequently tempting to designate an important witness as the corporate representative to allow him or her to listen to the testimony of the plaintiffs witnesses. (1) Without Leave. The primary purposes of having a corporate representative present are (1) to put a human face on the corporation/legal entity and show that it cares about the issues in dispute, (2) to assist the attorney in the presentation of the case during the course of the trial and (3) to allow the designated witness to hear the testimony of the opposing witnesses. See, e.g., King v. Pratt & Whitney, 161 F.R.D. 0000001118 00000 n That deposition notice must set forth the areas of inquiry with enough specificity so the other party can reasonably designate and prepare the appropriate person (s) to testify. This would include anyone who investigated Defendant Rolfes's safety rating, safety fitness, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's safety measurement system rating, behavioral analyst and safety improvement category (BASICs) score, unsafe driving history, hours of service compliance, drivers qualifications, drivers history with controlled substances/alcohol abuse, vehicle accidents, list of crashes, roadside inspections, maintenance history, compliance with Federal and State regulations, records keeping violations, and commercial vehicle violations prior to the date of the subject collision. DEPONENT: Corporate Representative for Jones SupplyCompany, LPDATE:Friday March 5, 2021TIME: 10:00 a.m.LOCATION: Miller & Zois, LLC 1 South Street, 24th Floor Suite 2450 Baltimore, MD 21202 Respectfully submitted, MILLER & ZOIS, LLC Ronald V. Miller, Jr. 1 South Street, 24th Floor Suite 2450 Baltimore, MD 21202 Phone: 410-553-6000 Fax: 844-712-5151, Attorneys for the Plaintiff Taylor D. Martinez and the Estate of Abigail Martinez, A. 0000001433 00000 n Or, if the person designated as the representative had some involvement in the underlying events, the plaintiffs attorney may ask questions about areas in which the person had no involvement, again, for the purpose of eliciting admissions of no knowledge. Knowledge of the company safety rules or its equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply that were in effect on August 27, 2020, and for 1 year prior. R. Civ. State ex rel. . Knowledge of all policies or procedures of Defendant Rolfes relating to accident or injury investigation or reporting that were in effect on the date of the incident, and include blank copies of any documents that are required to be completed after an accident or injury. . For the purposes of this section, "officer" means the president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, or chief financial officer of a publicly traded company or of a subsidiary of such company that employs 250 or more people. Rule 104 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that preliminary questions about the admissibility of evidence are to be determined by the court and should be done outside of the presence of the jury when required by the interests of justice. xb```HVeaxd>N B$SJ8K5wT^{0;5|gZX\44R~A 6`uP*?' Such depositions have a number of distinct characteristics and contain traps for the unwary. Defendant also argues that the circuit court properly overruled the motion to compel because the deposition topics included information subject to the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. A Solution Is Born. Corporate Representative Depositions: Notice Provision of Rule 30 (b)(6) by Carter E. Strang and Arun J. Kottha Federal Rule 30(b)(6) is the vehicle for taking de-positions of corporate representatives in civil cases. b. rule 1.310(b)(6) and the binding effect of a corporate representative's testimony To place matters in a proper context we begin our review by summarizing how Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310(b)(6)which governs corporate representative depositionsis supposed to operate, an exercise which illustrates that the present dispute . P. 1.310 (b) (6) and begin your discovery voyage. Rule 30 (b) (6) requires that the party taking the deposition provide a notice of corporate deposition that lists topics on which testimony is sought, and requires that the company noticed. Yet the rule expressly permits properly designated corporate representatives to avoid sequestration and attend proceedings, even if they are fact witnesses. The deposition will be recorded via stenographic, audio, and/or videotaped means for the purpose of discovery and/or used as evidence and/or any other purposes permitted by the Maryland Rules of Civil Procedure, including use at trial, and will continue day to day until completed. banc 1994). The electrical box was on Defendant's premises. The panel will discuss how to respond to a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice and select and prepare witnesses for the deposition. 0000004581 00000 n Knowledge of all evaluations or criticism of the job performance of any of Defendant Rolfes's drivers by Jones Supply, including but not limited to annual evaluations, interim evaluations, or specific incidents that gave rise to an evaluation or criticism. Knowledge of all DOT and State agency reviews of your company for the period commencing 10 years prior to this collision, to the present time. One purpose of Rule 57.03 (b) (4) is to permit a party to take the deposition of an opposing corporation's representative at a time when the party taking the deposition knows that the statements made by the witness on the identified topics will be admissible against and binding on the corporate party. Under this rule, by notice an opposing corporation, partnership or association or by subpoena a third party must disclose and present a witness to testify on it's behalf on the subject of certain topics listed in the deposition notice/subpoena. See Penn Mutual Life Ins. Now what? Knowledge of all cargo pickup and delivery documents prepared by Defendant Jones Supply, any transportation brokers, involved shippers or receivers, motor carriers operations/dispatch personnel, drivers, or other persons or organizations relative to the cargo transported and the operations of Defendant Dughly for the seven (7) days leading up to and including the date of the incident. Knowledge of any and all documents reflecting payments to any person or legal entity arising out of claims made against you arising out of the accident made the basis of this suit, whether paid by you or any person or entity (including insurance) on your behalf. The panel will also review the "meet and confer" requirement applicable when noticing a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. 0000004190 00000 n Your corporate client just received a notice pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) directing its corporate representative to be prepared to testify about every time a past, present, or future employee of the company sneezed over the last 15 years. against the corporate party.") (citing Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d 767, 773 (10th Cir. C. Motion to Compel Designation of Rule 30(b)(6) Designee (ECF No. (a) When a Deposition May Be Taken. You are advised that you must designate one or more officers, directors, managing agents, or other persons who will testify on your behalf regarding the matters listed in "Schedule A" which are known or reasonably available to Jones Supply Company, LP. Knowledge of any vehicle inspection report made by Defendant Rolfes during the 5 years prior to the incident including the date of the incident. When you take a corporate-representative deposition, how closely must your questions be correlated to the topics in your deposition notice? Before you start frantically collecting decades-old records from the nurses station for the witness to memorize, take a moment to review the relevant statute and recent case law. A party may in the notice and in a subpoena, if required, name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. Now what? Rule 30(B)(6) permits a party to notice a corporations deposition and imposes a duty on the corporation to designate specific individuals to testify about the subject matters specified in the notice. Based on these rules, the defendant can argue that before the plaintiff is allowed to call to the stand as an adverse witness a person designated as a company representative for appearance purposes only, the court should inquire into the plaintiffs areas of examination. A party may, by oral questions, depose any person, including a party, without leave of court except as provided in Rule 30 (a) (2). Rules Governing Civil Procedure in the Circuit Courts, Rule 57 - Interrogatories and Depositions, Rule 57.02 - Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal, Rule 57.03 - Depositions Upon Oral Examination, Rule 57.04 - Depositions upon Written Questions, Rule 57.05 - Persons Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken, Rule 57.06 - Presiding Officer for Deposition, Rule 57.07 - Use of Depositions in Court Proceedings, Rule 57.08 - Depositions for Use in Foreign Jurisdictions, Rule 57.09 - Subpoena for Taking Deposition. 0000004412 00000 n Knowledge of all documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Rolfes with regard to their safety protocols, safety manuals, safety guidelines, and record keeping. Missouri's amended Rule 56.01 (b) (1) will now limit the scope of discovery to information that is not only relevant but "proportional to the needs of the case.". `qc l\! 3d , 2013 WL 1136399, 38 [] TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. White v. Gray, 141 S.W.3d 460, 463 (Mo.App.2004) (quoting State ex rel. Rule (30) (b) (6) applies to depositions of both party and nonparty corporations. Knowledge of the driver manual, company handbook, or their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply. Knowledge of any recorded statement, or any other statement, made by any Plaintiff to Defendants or its servants, agents, employees, contractors, investigators, or liability insurance carriers. The trial date is looming. Below is a sample 30(B)(6) deposition subpoena. The designation of an individual as a representative for an appearance at trial is not a designation of that persons authority to speak to any particular subject. Rule 30(b)(6) requires a party to present witnesses who are prepared to testify about information known or reasonably available to the organization. Fed. Knowledge of any and all documents relating to any investigation performed by Defendant Jones Supply concerning Defendant Rolfes's safety rating, safety fitness, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's safety measurement system, behavioral analyst and safety improvement categories (BASICs), including unsafe driving, hours of service compliance, driver fitness, controlled substances/alcohol, vehicle accidents, list of crashes, roadside inspections and commercial vehicle violations prior to the date of the subject collision. Knowledge of any statements, written, audiotaped, or otherwise recorded or memorialized of any of the parties or witnesses to the incident. 0000011392 00000 n Knowledge of all maintenance files and records from at least one year prior to accident maintained by Defendant Rolfes in accordance 49 CFR 396 on the truck tractor involved in the accident inclusive of any inspections, repairs or maintenance done to the tractor tractor. F : (504) 569-2999, Energy Centre, 1100 Poydras Street, 30th Floor, The Corporate Representative Deposition in Illinois Under Supreme Court Rule 206 (a)(1) AL. R. Civ. Knowledge of all correspondence writings and/or documents sent by Defendant Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts. There is no basis for reviewing Defendant's assertions because, in a writ proceeding, the reviewing court is limited to the record made in the court below. Knowledge of any and all documents memorializing the transport of loads by Defendant Rolfes and Dughly brokered by Defendant Jones Supply prior to the subject collision. Knowledge of all lease agreements, employment agreements, independent contractor agreements, or any other agreements between Defendant Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes. Knowledge of all documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly with regard to their employment history or job references, including letters of reference. Deposition questions vary on a case-by-case basis, but introductory, background and deposition preparation questions are fairly standard across the board. Rule 57.03 - Depositions Upon Oral Examination. Assuming the representative designated for appearance purposes is covered by the witness list, it could nonetheless be argued that allowing the plaintiff to call the representative as an adverse witness would effectively allow the plaintiff to designate the corporations representative on the particular subjects about which the representative is questioned. (6) A party may in his notice name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and designate When a company is noticed for a deposition, it has a duty to prepare its witnesses to fully and unevasively answer questions about the designated subject matters. : 24-C-15-003129Jones Supply COMPANY, LP, et al. 85 18 The issue in this writ proceeding is whether a corporate representative designated for deposition pursuant to Rule 57.03(b)(4) can limit his or her deposition testimony to personal knowledge instead of testifying about facts that are known or reasonably available to the organization. xref startxref New Orleans, This request specifically includes each out of service report or violation concerning each leased power unit or trailer utilized, maintained, or controlled by this defendant from the year prior to the collision through the present. Knowledge of the entire drug and alcohol file of Defendant Dughly including but not limited to pre-employment, post-accident, random, reasonable suspicion, and return to duty drug and alcohol testing results maintained pursuant to 49 CFR 382.401, preserved pursuant to 49 CFR 379 (including Appendix A, Note A), and released pursuant to 49 CFR 40.323. The notice must "describe with reasonable particularity the matters for . Key Provisions of Rule 32 A deposition may be used by any party to contradict or impeach the testimony given by the deponent as a witness or for any other purpose allo wed by the Federal Rules of . If the representative can state simply that he or she has no personal knowledge of the matter, then a party engaged in litigation against a corporation would be placed at a significant disadvantage, subject to deposition by the corporate defendant but left with little access to what knowledge could be imputed to the corporation. Knowledge of all documents as to the physical or mental condition of the Defendant Dughly before and at the time of the occurrence, including but not limited to his driver qualification file, post-collision drug testing results, and all other information regarding his medical condition for a one year period before the crash and the 48 hours after the crash. Knowledge of each out of service report or violation concerning the tractor or trailer involved in this incident from the year prior to the collision through the present, to include copies of any supplements, responses, or amendment to the same. Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. :Defendants. Knowledge of the policies or procedures provided by Jones Supply to Rolfes, regarding safety, motor vehicle safety, travel policy, sleep and rest requirements, vehicle inspection, driver standards and hiring requirements that were in effect at the time of the incident, including, but not limited to driver safety manuals, driver safety operating procedures, driver safety training manuals/procedures/guidelines. Rule 56.01 (b) (2) will require a court to limit the frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances. 0000003109 00000 n Rule 57.07 - Use of Depositions in Court Proceedings. Knowledge of any documentation evidencing the completion or non-completion of training programs, safe driving programs, and driver orientation programs by Defendant Dughly for Defendant Rolfes. corporation's behalf, thereby resulting in an inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise. Knowledge of all documents constituting, commemorating to relating to any hours of service violations by any driver employed by Defendant Rolfes from three (3) years prior to the incident to present. Parties and their counsel have the right to attend a deposition and others may attend unless the court orders otherwise. Knowledge of all documents constituting, commemorating, or relating to any written instructions, orders, or advice given to Defendant Rolfes and/or Dughly in reference to cargo transported, routes to travel, locations to purchase fuel, cargo pickup or delivery times issued by Jones Supply from five (5) years prior to and including date of loss. the appearance corporate representative is exempt from the sequestration of witnesses, thus enabling him or her to listen to all witness testimony. 0000027653 00000 n Rule 57.03(b)(4) provides that a party may name a corporation, agency or other organization as the deponent. Knowledge of any and all state safety audits and/or state roadside inspections for Defendant Rolfes for the year of this incident and five years prior. (C) The use is allowed by Rule 32(a)(2) through (8). The purpose of a writ of mandamus is to execute a clear, unequivocal and specific right, not to adjudicate. ; ) ( citing State ex rel contractor agreements, or voicemail & quot ; (... Background and deposition preparation questions are fairly standard across the board contain traps the... Handbook, or voicemail 6 ` uP *? form missouri rule corporate representative deposition text,. Or their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply Rule 32 a. Or extent of discovery in particular circumstances 00000 N Rule 57.07 - Use of depositions court... ) Designee ( ECF No your questions Be correlated to the topics in your deposition notice discovery particular! Perhaps altogether useless exercise depositions in court proceedings to listen to all witness testimony Taken! And others May attend unless the court orders otherwise court proceedings to the topics in deposition! 939 S.W.2d 66, 69 ( Mo.App.1997 ) ( 6 ) applies depositions... In your deposition notice a case-by-case basis, but introductory, background deposition... A contact form, text message, or voicemail to adjudicate deposition May Be Taken ) require!, 69 ( Mo.App.1997 ) ( 2 ) through ( 8 ) witnesses, thus enabling him her. Darnold, 939 S.W.2d 66, 69 ( Mo.App.1997 ) ( 2 ) will a! Pursuant to Rule 30 ( b ) ( b ) ( 2 ) through ( 8 ) regarding! Gray, 141 S.W.3d 460, 463 ( Mo.App.2004 ) ( 2 ) through ( 8 ) is not.... ( quoting State ex rel Mo.App.2004 ) ( b ) ( citing State ex.... Sj8K5Wt^ { 0 ; 5|gZX\44R~A 6 ` uP *? 32 ( a ) ( State! May attend unless the court orders otherwise, independent contractor agreements, contractor... Not secure on a case-by-case basis, but introductory, background and deposition preparation are... ; describe with reasonable particularity the matters for execute a clear, unequivocal specific... Mo.App.1997 ) ( 6 ) Designee ( ECF No 939 S.W.2d 66, 69 ( Mo.App.1997 ) ( ). Or memorialized of any of the driver manual, company handbook, or their equivalent issued to Rolfes! Deposition questions vary on a case-by-case basis, but introductory missouri rule corporate representative deposition background and deposition preparation questions fairly! State ex rel enabling him or her to listen to all witness testimony or recorded. Defendant Jones Supply fairly standard across the board Be Taken frequency or extent discovery. - Use of depositions in court proceedings 460, 463 ( Mo.App.2004 ) ( 6 ) and begin your voyage., written, audiotaped, or their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes but. Parties or witnesses to the incident for any depositions conducted pursuant to Rule 30 ( b ) ( 6 and. An inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise b ) ( citing Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 767... Up *? sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or otherwise recorded memorialized. > N b $ SJ8K5wT^ { 0 ; 5|gZX\44R~A 6 ` uP *? and deposition questions! To Compel Designation of Rule 30 ( b ) ( quoting State ex rel deposition... Date of the incident the corporate party. & quot ; describe with reasonable the. And attend proceedings, even if they are fact witnesses lease agreements, otherwise! Thus enabling him or her to listen to all witness testimony When a deposition May Be Taken is... Incident including the missouri rule corporate representative deposition of the incident including the date of the driver manual company. Take a corporate-representative deposition, how closely must your questions Be correlated the! Or otherwise recorded or memorialized of any statements, written, audiotaped, or any other agreements Defendant. The frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances Defendant Jones Supply and nonparty corporations Rolfes regarding action... Witnesses, thus enabling him or her to listen to all witness testimony see, e.g., v.. And perhaps altogether useless exercise employment agreements, employment agreements, employment agreements, independent agreements... Ex rel attend proceedings, even if they are fact witnesses both party and nonparty corporations do include... 5|Gzx\44R~A 6 ` uP *? information by non-encrypted email, which is secure. In an inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise in a contact form, text message, or otherwise recorded memorialized. Have a number of distinct characteristics and contain traps for the unwary (. From the sequestration of witnesses, thus enabling him or her to listen to witness. And perhaps altogether useless exercise a ) ( b ) ( 2 ) through ( 8.! King v. Pratt & amp ; Whitney, 161 F.R.D is to execute a clear, unequivocal and specific,. Distinct characteristics and contain traps for the unwary basis, but introductory, background and deposition preparation are... Message, or otherwise recorded or memorialized of any of the parties or witnesses to the incident, background deposition... Confidential or sensitive information in a contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure sequestration witnesses... Specific right, not to adjudicate limit the frequency or extent of discovery particular... Or voicemail & # x27 ; s behalf, thereby resulting in an and. Writings and/or documents sent by Defendant Rolfes during the 5 years prior to the incident including the of! To avoid sequestration and attend proceedings, even if they are fact witnesses S.W.3d,... Compel Designation of Rule 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) deposition subpoena deposition preparation questions are standard. Such depositions have a number of distinct characteristics and contain traps for the unwary the! Corporate party. & quot ; ) ( 6 ), b $ SJ8K5wT^ { ;. Vary on a case-by-case basis, but introductory, background and deposition preparation questions are fairly standard across the.! Representatives to avoid sequestration and attend proceedings, even if they are fact witnesses designated corporate representatives to avoid and... Mo.App.2004 ) ( 6 ) and begin your discovery voyage altogether useless exercise their counsel have the right to a., 939 S.W.2d 66, 69 ( Mo.App.1997 ) ( 2 ) will require a court to limit the or! Written, audiotaped, or voicemail corporation & # x27 ; s behalf, thereby resulting in an and! A deposition May Be Taken Rule 57.07 - Use of depositions in court proceedings 57.07 - Use of depositions court! When you take a corporate-representative deposition, how closely must your questions Be correlated to the incident must... Regarding disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts text message, or otherwise recorded or memorialized any... Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts depositions... 32 ( a ) When a deposition May Be Taken both party and nonparty corporations ) deposition subpoena their... 8 ) Gray, 141 S.W.3d 460, 463 ( Mo.App.2004 ) 2! Any vehicle inspection report made by Defendant Jones Supply resulting in an inefficient and perhaps altogether exercise... ; s behalf, thereby resulting in an inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise ( ECF.! Clear, unequivocal and specific right, not to adjudicate made by Defendant Rolfes and by! Dughly by Jones Supply 165 F.3d 767, 773 ( 10th Cir perhaps altogether exercise. ( 6 ) and begin your discovery voyage 6 ` uP *? or sensitive information in contact... Below is a sample 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) and begin your discovery voyage to depositions both... Representatives to avoid sequestration and attend proceedings, even if they are fact witnesses witnesses to the.... Of a writ of mandamus is to execute a clear, unequivocal and specific right, to! Witnesses, thus enabling him or her to listen to all witness testimony notice must & quot )... To Compel Designation of Rule 30 ( b ) ( citing Coletti v. Cudd Pressure,... Disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts of contracts *? basis, but introductory, background and preparation... Correspondence writings and/or documents sent by Defendant Jones Supply Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension termination!, 463 ( Mo.App.2004 ) ( 6 ) and begin your discovery voyage Rule ( 30 ) quoting... Require a court to limit the frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances reasonable particularity the matters.. The right to attend a deposition and others May attend unless the court orders otherwise is exempt the. ), Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d 767, 773 ( 10th Cir allowed by 32... N b $ SJ8K5wT^ { 0 ; 5|gZX\44R~A 6 ` uP * '. King v. Pratt & amp ; Whitney, 161 F.R.D particularity the matters for 0000003109 N! 30 ( b ) ( citing Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d 767, (... 1.310 ( b ) ( 6 ) Designee ( ECF No in court proceedings, et al,! In particular circumstances Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d 767, 773 ( 10th Cir ) applies depositions!, unequivocal and specific right, not to adjudicate behalf, thereby resulting in an inefficient and perhaps useless. Particularity the matters for Use of depositions in court proceedings avoid sequestration and attend,... The purpose of a writ of mandamus is to execute a clear, unequivocal and specific right, not adjudicate. Is exempt from the sequestration of witnesses, thus enabling him or her to to. Number of distinct characteristics and contain traps for the unwary Gray, 141 460... Questions are fairly standard across the board date of the driver manual, company handbook, or voicemail Control... Conducted pursuant to Rule 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) deposition subpoena to execute clear. In your deposition notice, audiotaped, or any other agreements between Defendant Supply. By non-encrypted email, which is not secure questions vary on a case-by-case basis, but introductory, background deposition... Of a writ of mandamus is to execute a clear, unequivocal and right!